Fernandez

Fernandez v. CoreLogic Credco, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 25, 20223:20-cv-01262California11,567 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARCO A. FERNANDEZ, individually Case No.: 3:20-cv-1262-JM-(AGS) and as a representative of the class,

ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS

Plaintiff, FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT v. AND MOTION TO STRIKE CLASS

ALLEGATIONS

CORELOGIC CREDCO, LLC.,

15 Defendant. 16 This matter comes before the court on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 35) and Motion to Strike Class Allegations from Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 36.) The motions have been fully briefed and the court finds them suitable for determination on the papers in accordance with Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1). For the reasons set forth below, Defendant’s motions are denied. I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On June 2, 2020, Plaintiff Marco A. Fernandez filed a putative class action complaint against Defendant CoreLogic Credco, LLC (“Credco”) in San Diego Superior Court alleging violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.