Reynolds

Reynolds v. Madden

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 24, 20223:21-cv-00955California10,903 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HAISANI REYNOLDS, Case No.: 21-cv-00955-BAS-RBB

CDCR #AN-9755,

ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL

Plaintiff, ACTION FOR FAILING TO STATE vs. A CLAIM PURSUANT TO 14 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) AND RAYMOND MADDEN, et al., 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) Defendants. 16 [ECF No. 7] 17 18 Plaintiff Haisani Reynolds, incarcerated at Centinela State Prison (“CEN”), is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis (“IFP”) in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 22 I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Reynold’s original Complaint alleged that almost three dozen CEN correctional, inmate appeal, disciplinary, and classification officials violated his First, Fourth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendment rights after he refused to “strip out” while a cell search was conducted in his housing unit on May 30, 2019. Reynolds further alleged that he was patted down, subjected to metal detection, …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.