Cebulski

Cebulski v. San Diego Unified School District

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 1, 20223:21-cv-00503California1,608 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CATHERINE CEBULSKI and THOMAS Case No.: 21-CV-503-CAB-JLB

CEBULSKI (PARENTS), ON BEHALF

OF THEIR CONSERVATEE, KARL ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS

CEBULSKI (STUDENT), THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT

Plaintiffs, [Doc. No. 48] v. SAN DIEGO UNIFIED SCHOOL

DISTRICT,

17 Defendant.

19 Pending before the Court is Defendant’s motion to dismiss the Third Amended 20 Complaint (“TAC”). [Doc. No. 48.] For the reasons set forth below, the motion is

GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

23 On September 15, 2021, Plaintiffs Catherine Cebulski and Thomas Cebulski 24 (Parents), on behalf of their conservatee, Karl Cebulski (Student) (hereinafter collectively 25 “Cebulskis”), filed a Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) against Defendant San Diego 26 Unified School District (“SDUSD”). [Doc. No. 32.] The SAC alleged the following 27 causes of action: (1) First Claim for Relief: Enforcement under [42 U.S.C.] Section 1983; 28 (2) Third [sic] Claim for Relief: Enforcement…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.