Biden

De Cristo Cano v. Biden

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 4, 20223:22-cv-00193California3,007 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 CORAZON DE CRISTO CANO et al., Case No.: 22-CV-193-CAB-AHG

Plaintiffs,

ORDER DENYING EX PARTE

v. APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY

RESTRAINING ORDER AND

JOSEPH R. BIDEN et al.,

DISMISSING COMPLAINT

Defendants. [Doc. No. 3] 16 Plaintiffs, a collection of over 100 individuals residing throughout the United States (along with one plaintiff residing in Germany) who are allegedly employed by dozens of different government agencies or federal contractors, bring this suit against government agencies and federal officials, including President Joseph R. Biden, the Centers for Disease Control, and the Safer Federal Workforce Task Force and its individual members, seeking to enjoin enforcement of two executive orders imposing COVID-19 vaccine requirements on federal employees (the “Employee Mandate”) and federal contractors (the “Contractor Mandate”), respectively. Shortly after filing the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.