Phipps

Phipps v. Camp Pendleton & Quantico Housing, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 1, 20223:21-cv-01514California1,314 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 VICTORIA PHIPPS, Case No.: 3:21-cv-01514-DMS-AHG

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART JOINT MOTION

TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER

CAMP PENDLETON & QUANTICO

HOUSING, LLC, et al., [ECF No. 13] Defendants. 16 Before the Court is the parties’ Joint Motion to Amend Scheduling Order. ECF No. 13. The parties ask that the Court extend the fact discovery deadline of May 9, 2022 by approximately 120 days, and that the Court extend concurrently extend the remaining case deadlines as appropriate. Id. Under Fed. R. Civ. P 16(b)(4), “[a] schedule may be modified only for good cause and with the judge’s consent.” “Good cause” is a non-rigorous standard that has been construed broadly across procedural and statutory contexts. Ahanchian v. Xenon Pictures, Inc., 624 F.3d 1253, 1259 (9th Cir. 2010). The good cause standard focuses on the diligence of the party seeking to amend …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.