Springs

Springs v. Raber

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 4, 20223:21-cv-00862California5,288 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 JORDAN SPRINGS, Case No.: 21-cv-862-MMA (AGS)

CDCR #AS-6800,

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S

Plaintiff, MOTION FOR SUMMARY v. JUDGMENT

CORRECTIONAL OFFICER RABER,

[Doc. No. 21] Defendant. 17 18 Plaintiff Jordan Springs (“Plaintiff”), a California inmate proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging an Eighth Amendment excessive force claim against Defendant Raber (“Defendant”), a correctional officer at Calipatria State Prison (“CAL”), where Plaintiff is currently housed. See Doc. No. 1. Defendant moves for summary judgment on the basis that Plaintiff failed to exhaust his administrative remedies. Doc. No. 21. Plaintiff filed a response in opposition, to which Defendant replied. Doc. Nos. 24, 25. The Court took the matter under submission without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1.d.1 and Federal Rule of Civil 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.