Willis

Pavone & Fonner, LLP v. Willis

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 5, 20223:22-cv-00137California742 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 BENJAMIN PAVONE, et al., Case No.: 3:22-cv-137-L-JLB

Plaintiffs,

v.

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION FOR

12 MYZSA WILLIS, et al., LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER Defendants. JURISDICTION 14 On February 1, 2022, Plaintiffs Benjamin Pavone, Pavone & Fonner, LLP, and Law Offices of Benjamin Pavone, P.C. (“Plaintiffs”) filed this civil action against Defendants Myzsa Willis, Judge Kenneth Medel, Justice Joan K. Irion, Justice Terry O’Rourke, and Justice Truc Do (“Defendants”). This action relates to a fee dispute between Plaintiffs and Defendant Willis, their former client. Defendant Judge Medel presided over that dispute. Plaintiffs appealed to the California Court of Appeals. The panel—Defendants Justice Irion, Justice O’Rourke, and Justice Do—affirmed the judgment. Plaintiffs then sought review at the California Supreme Court. Plaintiffs assert one claim against Defendants under 42 U.S.C. section 1983.1 Plaintiffs seek to invalidate the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.