Pulley

Pulley v. Paramo

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 5, 20223:14-cv-02034California442 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT G. PULLEY, Case No.: 14-CV-2034 JLS (MDD)

Petitioner,

ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S

v. MOTION TO REOPEN

PROCEEDINGS

DANIEL PARAMO, Warden; and

KAMALA D. HARRIS, Attorney (ECF No. 71) General, 16 Respondents. 17 This closed federal habeas corpus action was filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 by pro se state prisoner Robert G. Pulley. The Court denied the Petition and entered judgment in favor of Respondents on November 14, 2016. ECF Nos. 54, 55. Petitioner filed multiple appeals in this matter, see ECF Nos. 56, 57, 63, all of which were denied or dismissed as duplicative, see ECF Nos. 61, 65, 66. Petitioner filed a post-judgment motion on June 2, 2021, ECF No. 68, which the Court construed as a second or successive habeas petition and subsequently denied (the “Order”), ECF No. 69. The present Motion, which Petitioner titled “Motion to Reopen Proceedings,” followed. ECF No. 71. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.