Becerra

Becerra v. Allstate Northbrook Indemnity Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 29, 20223:22-cv-00202California502 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STEFANIE BECERRA, Case No. 22-cv-0202-BAS-MSB

Plaintiff,

ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANT

v. TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

ALLSTATE NORTHBROOK

INDEMNITY COMPANY,

15 Defendant.

Defendant removed from the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of San Diego the instant action on February 14, 2022. (Notice of Removal, ECF No. 1; Compl., Ex. A to Notice of Removal, ECF No. 1-2.) It is well-settled that upon arrival in federal court, a complaint in state court becomes subject to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Rules”) as though it had been initially filed in federal district court. See Labertew v. Langemeier, 846 F.3d 1028 (9th Cir. 2017); but see Istituto Per Lo Sviluppo Economico Dell’ Italia Meridonale v. Sperti Prods., Inc., 47 F.R.D. 310, 312–13 (S.D.N.Y. 1969) (“Only pleadings filed subsequent to removal must conform to the requirements of the federal rules.”). As a general matter, the Rules “do…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.