Wietfelt

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 LISA WIETFELT, Case No.: 21-CV-1684-CAB(WVG)

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING JOINT MOTION

v. SEEKING TO EXTEND DEADLINE

FOR FACT DISCOVERY ONLY

COMDATA et al.,

Defendants. 15 16 17 On April 6, 2022, the Parties filed a Joint Motion Seeking to Extend Deadline for Fact Discovery Only (“Joint Motion”). (Doc. No. 18.) The Joint Motion requested the Court extend the fact discovery deadline 60 days. For the reasons set forth below, the Joint Motion is DENIED. As provided in the Court’s Scheduling Order, the dates and times set forth in the Scheduling Order will not be modified except for good cause shown. In determining whether to modify a scheduling order the Court considers the “good cause” standard set out by Rule 16(b)(4) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Rule 16(b)(4)”). Rule 16(b)(4) provides a schedule may be modified only for good cause and with the judge’s consent. Rule 16(b)(4)’s…