McMorrow

McMorrow v. Mondelez International, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 8, 20223:17-cv-02327California7,392 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PATRICK MCMORROW, et al., Case No. 17-cv-02327-BAS-JLB Plaintiffs,

ORDER:

13 v.

MONDELEZ INTERNATIONAL, INC., (1) GRANTING MOTION FOR

FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS Defendant. SETTLEMENT (ECF No. 206); 16 (2) GRANTING MOTION FOR

ATTORNEYS’ FEES, COSTS, AND

18 SERVICE AWARDS (ECF No. 200); AND 20 (3) OVERRULING OBJECTION TO MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES,

COSTS, AND SERVICE AWARDS

22 (ECF No. 201) 23 Patrick McMorrow, Marco Ohlin, and Melody DiGregorio (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) commenced this class action against Defendant Mondelez International, Inc. (“Mondelez”), alleging that Mondelez labeled its belVita breakfast biscuits as “nutritious,” despite the biscuits’ high added sugar content. (Compl., ECF No. 1.) The parties negotiated a settlement and on November 19, 2021, the Court granted …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.