Mantikas

Mantikas v. Edick

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 8, 20223:21-cv-00378California2,687 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALEXANDRA MANTIKAS, Case No.: 21-CV-378 JLS (MSB) an individual,

ORDER GRANTING JOINT

Plaintiff, MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF v. FLSA SETTLEMENT

EUGENE EDICK, an individual; (ECF No. 7) JAIME IGLESIAS, an individual; BROGDON PROPERTIES INCORPORATED, a California 17 corporation dba The Main Attraction Gentlemen’s Club; DOE MANAGERS 1 THROUGH 3, inclusive; and DOES 19 4 THROUGH 10, inclusive, 20 Defendants.

Presently before the Court is the Parties’ Joint Motion for Approval of FLSA Settlement (“Joint Mot.,” ECF No. 7). Also before the Court is the Declaration of John P. Kristensen in Support of the Joint Motion (“Kristensen Decl.,” ECF No. 7-1). After reviewing the Settlement Agreement (Kristensen Decl. Ex. 1 (“Ex. 1”), ECF No. 7-2), Plaintiff’s Complaint (“Compl.,” ECF No. 1), and the law, the Court finds that the Settlement Agreement is fundamentally fair, reasonable,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.