Cleveland v. Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research Ltd

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 30, 20223:19-cv-02141California6,060 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DON CLEVELAND, et al., Case No.: 19-cv-02141-JM-JLB

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART

PLAINTIFFS/COUNTER-

LUDWIG INSTITUTE FOR CANCER

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO

RESEARCH LTD, et al., COMPEL Defendants. 16 (ECF Nos. 164 (sealed), 166)

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIM.

18 19 Before the Court is a Motion to Compel filed by Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants Don Cleveland, Arshad Desai, Frank Furnari, Richard Kolodner, Paul Mischel, Karen Oegema and Bing Ren (collectively, “Plaintiffs”). (ECF Nos. 164 (sealed), 166.) Plaintiffs move to compel the production of documents from Defendants/Counter- Claimants Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research Ltd. (“Ludwig” or “Institute”), Edward McDermott, Chi Van Dang, and John Notter (collectively, “Defendants”) responsive to Plaintiffs’ Requests for Production 175 and 182. (Id. at 2.) Defendants filed an opposition (ECF No.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.