Bendorf

Bendorf v. Sea World LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 8, 20223:21-cv-02061California2,967 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 THERESA BENDORF, individually, and Case No.: 21-cv-02061-AJB-AGS on behalf of other members of the public 12 similarly situated, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REMAND Plaintiff, 14 (Doc. No. 6) v.

16 SEA WORLD LLC, a Delaware limited liability company doing business as SEAWORLD SAN DIEGO doing 18 business as AQUATICA SAN DIEGO; SEAWORLD PARKS & ENTERTAINMENT, an unknown entity; 20 and DOES 1 THROUGH 25, inclusive, 21 Defendants.

23 Before the Court is Theresa Bendorf’s (“Plaintiff” or “Bendorf”) motion to remand. (Doc. No. 6.) Sea World LLC and SeaWorld Parks & Entertainment, Inc. (“Defendants” or “Sea World”) oppose the motion, and Plaintiff filed a reply. (Doc. Nos. 11, 12.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion to remand. 28 I. BACKGROUND On August 25, 2021, Plaintiff filed this putative class action in San Diego County Superior Court against Sea World, her former employer. She brought claims for:…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.