Fisher

(HC) Rodriguez v. Fisher

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 8, 20223:21-cv-01443California2,780 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PEDRO RODRIGUEZ, Case No. 21-cv-1443-MMA (WVG)

Petitioner,

ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S

v. MOTION FOR

RECONSIDERATION AND

KATHLEEN ALLISON,

REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE

Respondent. [Doc. No. 43] 16 17 On August 9, 2021, Petitioner Pedro Rodriguez (“Petitioner”), proceeding pro se, filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Doc. No. 1. On February 7, 2022, Petitioner filed a motion to appoint counsel. See Doc. No. 40. On February 14, 2022, the Court issued an order denying without prejudice Petitioner’s motion to appoint counsel. Doc. No. 42 (the “Order”). Petitioner now seeks reconsideration of the Order. Doc. No. 43. Respondent has not filed an opposition to date. See Docket. On March 17, 2022, Petitioner filed a request for judicial notice. See Doc. No. 44. For the foregoing reasons, the Court DENIES Petitioner’s motion for reconsideration. 27 28 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.