Lindland
Lindland v. TuSimple, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOHN LINDLAND, an individual, Case No.: 21-CV-417 JLS (MDD)
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING WITHOUT
v. PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
TO BIFURCATE AND DENYING
TUSIMPLE, INC.,
AS MOOT DEFENDANT’S
a California corporation; and EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS DOES 1–100, inclusive,
16 Defendants. (ECF Nos. 23, 28)
Presently before the Court is Plaintiff John Lindland’s (“Plaintiff” or “Mr. Lindland”) Motion to Bifurcate (“Mot.,” ECF No. 23). Also before the Court are Defendant TuSimple, Inc.’s (“Defendant” or “TuSimple”) Opposition to (“Opp’n,” ECF No. 25) and Plaintiff’s Reply in support of (“Reply,” ECF No. 26) the Motion, as well as Defendant’s Amended Evidentiary Objections (“Evid. Objs,” ECF No. 28). The Court vacated the hearing on the Motion and took the matter under submission pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1). See ECF No. 29. Having considered the Parties’ briefing and the…