Guerrero

Guerrero v. Moore

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 15, 20223:20-cv-01315California1,149 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Carlos GUERRERO, Case No.: 20-cv-01315-LL-BGS

Plaintiff,

ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION REQUESTING STATUS

14 [ECF No. 11] T. MOORE, Defendant. 17 Plaintiff Carlos Guerrero, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on July 10, 2020. (ECF No. 1.) On September 2, 2020, the Court issued an order granting Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) and directing the U.S. Marshal (“USMS”) to effect service on the Defendant T. Moore. (ECF No. 5.) The summons for Defendant T. Moore was returned unexecuted on December 14, 2020. (ECF No. 7.) On August 3, 2021, the Court indicated that Plaintiff sufficiently identified Defendant T. Moore as an employee of R.J. Donovan (“RJD”) and the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”) during the time of the incident. (ECF No. 10 at 2.) The Court then directed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.