Kernan

(PC) Riley v. Kernan

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 15, 20223:16-cv-00405California2,897 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STEVEN E. RILEY, Case No. 16-cv-405-MMA (AHG)

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

v. CERTIFY ORDER FOR

INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL

S. KERNAN, et al., Defendants. [Doc. No. 123] 16 17 Steven E. Riley (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner previously proceeding pro se,1 brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against S. Kernan, W.L. Montgomery, B. Hedrick, L. Paul, G. Chavarria, J. Hatfield, E. Uribe, G.Z. Hernandez, C. Imada, R. Witte, R. Garcia, J. Price, M. Whitman, L. Newman, C. Espitia, S. Cowey, and J. Grima (collectively, “Defendants”). See Doc. No. 36 (“FAC”). On December 6, 2021, the Court granted in part and denied in part Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. Doc. No. 106 (the “Summary Judgment Order”). Plaintiff now moves the 25 26 1 Following the Court’s ruling on summary judgment, the Court sua sponte reconsidered Plaintiff’s prior motions to appoint counsel pursuant to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.