NeSmith

NeSmith v. County of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 8, 20223:15-cv-00629California724 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Chassidy NESMITH, individually and Case No.: 15-CV-629 JLS (AGS) as guardian ad litem on behalf of S.N.,

ORDER (1) ADOPTING REPORT

Plaintiffs, AND RECOMMENDATION; v. (2) GRANTING MOTION FOR

APPROVAL OF MINOR’S

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, et al., COMPROMISE; (3) APPROVING Defendants. DECLARATION OF TRUST; AND 16 (4) DISMISSING ACTION 17 (ECF Nos. 227, 233, 234)

Presently before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Unopposed Ex Parte Motion for Approval of an Expedited Minor’s Compromise and Dismissal of Claims (“Mot.,” ECF No. 227), as well as Defendants’ Notice of Non-Opposition thereto (ECF No. 229). Magistrate Judge Andrew G. Schopler issued an Order Requiring Additional Briefing Concerning the Minor’s Compromise (“Order,” ECF No. 231). In response, Plaintiffs filed an Unopposed Supplement (ECF No. 232). Thereafter, Judge Schopler issued a Report and 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.