Storey

Storey v. Paramo

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 15, 20223:17-cv-00023California943 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DONTAZE A. STOREY, Case No.: 17cv23-LAB (BGS)

Petitioner,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

v. ENLARGEMENT OF TIME [Dkt. 80] DAINEL PARAMO, Respondent. 16 On August 27, 2019, the Court denied Dontaze A. Storey’s habeas corpus petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 and entered judgment against him. (Dkt. 66). Storey filed a timely notice of appeal. (Dkt. 73). He also filed objections to the Report and Recommendation issued in his case by Magistrate Judge Michael Berg, which the Court treated as a motion for relief from judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59. (Dkt. 72). On July 7, 2021, this Court overruled Storey’s objections and also denied his motion for reconsideration of the Court’s earlier order denying his habeas corpus petition. (Dkt. 78). That order was entered on July 8, 2021. (Id.). Storey didn’t file an amended notice of appeal from this post-judgment order. Instead, on August 19,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.