Herrera

Herrera v. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 18, 20223:18-cv-02328-JLS-RNBCalifornia3,269 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHELLE H., Case No.: 18-CV-2328 JLS (RNB)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART

v. MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES

NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting (ECF No. 23) Commissioner of Social Security, 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 Presently before the Court is Plaintiff’s attorney Laura E. Krank’s (“Counsel”) Motion for Attorney’s Fees Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) (“Mot.,” ECF No. 23). Also before the Court is Defendant’s Statement of Non-Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion (ECF No. 25). Having considered Plaintiff’s arguments and the law, the Court GRANTS IN PART Counsel’s Motion. BACKGROUND On October 10, 2018, Plaintiff filed a complaint pursuant to Section 405(g) of the Social Security Act. (See generally ECF No. 1). Plaintiff asked the Court to review the final decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration denying Plaintiff’s claim for social security disability insurance…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.