Quesada

Quesada v. Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 18, 20223:19-cv-01280-KSCCalifornia2,914 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARQUITA MARIE Q., Case No.: 19-cv-01280-KSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED

v. MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting

Commissioner of Social Security [Doc. No. 27] Administration, 16 Defendant.

Before the Court is a Motion for Attorney Fees Pursuant to U.S.C. § 1383(d)(2)(B), in which plaintiff’s counsel requests an award of fees for representing plaintiff in connection with her application for Social Security disability benefits (the “Motion”). Doc. No. 27. The Motion is unopposed. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1.d.1, the Court finds the Motion suitable for disposition without argument. For the reasons stated herein, the Court GRANTS the Motion and ORDERS that counsel’s fees be paid from plaintiff’s benefit award consistent with the terms of this Order.

26 1 Plaintiff was given the opportunity to oppose the Motion but did not do so. Doc. No. 28. On…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.