Dahl

Dahl v. Kijakazi

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 19, 20223:22-cv-00414California827 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TINA DAHL, Case No.: 22-cv-414-BGS

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

v. LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA

PAUPERIS

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Commissioner of

Social Security, [ECF No. 3] Defendant. 16 17 18 On March 22, 2022, Plaintiff Tina Dahl filed a Complaint seeking judicial review of a decision by the Commissioner of Social Security denying disability benefits. (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff has not paid the civil filing fee required to commence this action. Before this Court is a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) filed by Plaintiff. (ECF No. 3.) All parties instituting any civil action, suit, or proceeding in a district court of the United States, except an application for a writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a); see 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) (requiring a party instituting a civil action to pay a filing fee of $350 as well as a $50 administrative fee). …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.