Berry
Berry v. County of San Diego
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTONIO BERRY, Case No.: 3:20-cv-0590-JAH-BLM
12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO v. WITHDRAW (ECF No. 26).
14 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, by and through THE METROPOLITAN
TRANSIT SYSTEM; OFFICER ERIC
16 ARELLANES, an individual and agent for County of San Diego; OFFICER ALEJANDRO CASAS, an individual and 18 agent for County for San Diego; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive,
20 Defendants.
23 On March 31, 2022, counsel for Plaintiff Antonio Berry (“Plaintiff” or “Mr. Berry”) 24 filed a motion to withdraw as attorney for Plaintiff, citing numerous difficulties. (ECF No. 25 26). Counsel has submitted a declaration in support of withdrawal, and also contends that 26 because the case is in the early stages of prosecution, a withdrawal would not cause 27 prejudice to the Plaintiff. 28 The decision to grant or deny a motion to withdraw is within the discretion of the court. Kassab v. San Diego Police Dep't, 2008 WL 251935, at * (S.D. Cal. Jan. 29, …