Branch

Branch v. Lilac Holdings, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 21, 20223:21-cv-00605California3,078 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KATHY BRANCH, Case No. 21-cv-00605-BAS-MDD

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. (1) GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S LILAC HOLDINGS, LLC,

MOTION TO SET ASIDE AND

Defendant. REMAND (ECF No. 10);

16 (2) SETTING ASIDE JUDGMENT 17 (ECF No. 9); and 18 (3) REMANDING CASE TO SAN

DIEGO SUPERIOR COURT

21 Before the Court is Plaintiff Kathy Branch’s motion (1) to set aside the judgment for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 60(b)(4), and (2) to remand the case to state court. (Mot., ECF No. 10.) Defendant Lilac Holdings, LLC d/b/a Reo Vista Healthcare Center opposes. (Opp’n, ECF No. 11.) The Court finds this motion suitable for determination on the papers submitted and without oral argument. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); Civ. L.R. 7.1(d)(1). Having considered all arguments (ECF No. 10), SETS ASIDE the prior judgment (ECF No. 9), and REMANDS the action to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.