Young
Young v. County of San Diego
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOE M. YOUNG, Case No.: 3:20-cv-02441-H-AHG
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING JOINT MOTION
v. TO VACATE MANDATORY
SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE AND
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, et al.,
ALL PRETRIAL DEADLINES
Defendants. [ECF No. 35]
17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Before the Court is the parties’ joint motion vacate the upcoming Mandatory Settlement Conference (“MSC”) and pretrial deadlines. ECF No. 35. Because Defendants’ motion for partial summary judgment (ECF No. 30) is pending, the parties seek to postpone the May 6 MSC and all other case management deadlines. ECF No. 35 at 2. Parties seeking to continue deadlines in the scheduling order must demonstrate good cause. FED. R. CIV. P. 16(b)(4) (“A schedule may be modified only for good cause and with the judge’s consent”); ECF No. 14 at 5 (Scheduling Order, stating that “[t]he dates set forth herein will not be modified except for good cause shown”); see also…