Young

Young v. County of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 20, 20223:20-cv-02441California842 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOE M. YOUNG, Case No.: 3:20-cv-02441-H-AHG

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING JOINT MOTION

v. TO VACATE MANDATORY

SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE AND

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, et al.,

ALL PRETRIAL DEADLINES

Defendants. [ECF No. 35]

17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Before the Court is the parties’ joint motion vacate the upcoming Mandatory Settlement Conference (“MSC”) and pretrial deadlines. ECF No. 35. Because Defendants’ motion for partial summary judgment (ECF No. 30) is pending, the parties seek to postpone the May 6 MSC and all other case management deadlines. ECF No. 35 at 2. Parties seeking to continue deadlines in the scheduling order must demonstrate good cause. FED. R. CIV. P. 16(b)(4) (“A schedule may be modified only for good cause and with the judge’s consent”); ECF No. 14 at 5 (Scheduling Order, stating that “[t]he dates set forth herein will not be modified except for good cause shown”); see also…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.