Newsome

Newsome v. Axos Bank

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 22, 20223:20-cv-01424California1,331 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 TANEASHA NEWSOME, Case No.: 20cv1424 JM(JLB)

Plaintiff,

ORDER ON MOTION TO CONFIRM

v. ARBITRATION AWARD AXOS BANK, a Savings and Loan Association and AXOS FINANCIAL, 14 INC., a Delaware corporation, 15 Defendants. 16 Presently before the court is Defendant Axos Bank’s and Defendant Axos Financial Inc.’s Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award. The court finds the motion suitable for submission on the papers and without oral argument in accordance with Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1). For the reasons set forth below, Defendants’ motion is granted. Background On July 23, 2020, Plaintiff Taneasha Newsome filed suit in this court alleging: (1) race discrimination in violation of California Government Code section 12940(a); (2) associational disability discrimination and wrongful termination in violation of California Government Code section 12940(a); (3) failure to provide reasonable 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.