Hale

Hale v. Villalpando

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 4, 20223:21-cv-01884California1,525 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DYLAN SCOTT HALE, Case No.: 21cv1884-LL-JLB

Petitioner,

ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S

v. MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY

INJUNCTION AND TEMPORARY

ANNE E. VILLALPANDO,

RESTRAINING ORDER

Respondent. [ECF No. 15] 16 17 Petitioner, an inmate whose Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is currently pending, moves for a preliminary injunction (“PI”) and temporary restraining order (“TRO”) to “enjoin the Defendants . . . . from enforcing or causing to be enforced the provisions of the Rules & Regulations of the Naval Consolidated Brig Miramar (“NCBM”).” ECF No. 15. On March 30, 2022, Respondent filed an opposition. ECF No. 18. The motion is suitable for submission without oral argument. For the below reasons, the motion is DENIED. I. BACKGROUND Petitioner asks the Court to enjoin the Respondent, the Commanding Officer (“CO”) of NCBM, from “issuing disciplinary sanctions for all matters relating to his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.