Toussaint

Toussaint v. All Points Realty

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 25, 20223:22-cv-00496California473 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 FRITZ GERALD TOUSSAINT, CASE NO. 22-cv-00496-LAB-JLB

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO vs. PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS WITHOUT PREJUDICE [Dkt. 2] ALL POINTS REALTY, Defendant.

Plaintiff Fritz Gerald Toussaint filed a Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. Dkt. 2. Because the Motion gives an incomplete picture of Toussaint’s finances, it is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) must establish that the litigant “cannot because of [his] poverty pay or give security for costs . . . and still be able to provide [him]self and dependents with the necessities of life.” Adkins v. E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co., 335 U.S. 331, 339-40 / / / / / / / / / / / / || (1948). Litigants must comply with this District's Local Rules governing IFP 2 || applications. See CivLR 3.2." The Motion is incomplete and contradictory, so the Court can't 4 || determine …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.