Harner

Harner v. USAA General Indemnity Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 28, 20223:18-cv-01993California2,375 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PAUL HARNER, an individual, Case No.: 18cv01993-LL-MDD

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE

v. 13 [ECF Nos. 77, 84, 88] USAA GENERAL INDEMNITY COMPANY, a Texas Corporation, 15 Defendant. 16 I. INTRODUCTION Before the Court is Plaintiff Paul Harner’s (“Plaintiff”) Request for Judicial Notice. ECF No. 77. After considering the papers submitted, supporting documentation, and applicable law, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s Request for Judicial Notice. II. BACKGROUND The Court incorporates by reference the factual and procedural history from its previous order in Harner v. USAA Gen. Indem. Co., --- F. Supp. 3d ---, No. 3:18-CV- 01993-LL-MDD, 2022 WL 718489, at *1 (S.D. Cal. Mar. 10, 2022). III. DISCUSSION Plaintiff asks the Court to take judicial notice of the following documents: (1) California Code of Regulations, Title 10, Chapter 5, Subchapter 7. (“Fair Claims Settlement Practices Regulations”) Sections 2695.1; 2695.2;…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.