Muro

Muro v. Gipson

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 25, 20223:22-cv-00550California2,107 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTONIO MURO, Case No.: 22cv0550 LL (JLB)

Petitioner,

ORDER DISMISSING CASE

v. WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND

NOTICE OF OPTIONS DUE TO

CONNIE GIPSON, et al.,

FAILURE TO EXHAUST STATE

Respondents. COURT REMEDIES 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, challenging a 2019 San Diego County Superior Court conviction in case number SCE383359, for which Petitioner was sentenced to 26 years to life. (ECF No. 1.) For the reasons discussed below, the Court DISMISSES the habeas action without prejudice. FAILURE TO SATISFY FILING FEE REQUIREMENT Petitioner has not paid the $5.00 filing fee and has not filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis. Because this Court cannot proceed until Petitioner has either paid the filing fee or qualified to proceed in forma pauperis, the Petition is subject to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.