Hudson
Hudson v. San Diego Sheriff's Department
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 JEFFREY DANIEL HUDSON, Case No.: 3:22-cv-00196-CAB-DEB Booking #21149533,
ORDER:
Plaintiff, 12 vs. 1) GRANTING MOTION TO
PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
SAN DIEGO SHERIFFS,
[ECF No. 5] Defendants.
AND
16 2) DISMISSING COMPLAINT FOR
FAILING TO STATE A CLAIM
PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) AND 19 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) 20 Jeffrey Daniel Hudson (“Plaintiff”), while detained at George Bailey Detention Facility (“GBDF”) in San Diego, California, and proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights Complaint (“Compl.”) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (See Compl., ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff did not pay the fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) when he filed his Complaint; instead he has filed a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) (ECF No. 5). / / / / / / I. Motion to Proceed IFP All parties instituting any civil action, suit or proceeding in a district court of the…