Hudson

Hudson v. San Diego Sheriff's Department

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 3, 20223:22-cv-00196California2,824 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 JEFFREY DANIEL HUDSON, Case No.: 3:22-cv-00196-CAB-DEB Booking #21149533,

ORDER:

Plaintiff, 12 vs. 1) GRANTING MOTION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

SAN DIEGO SHERIFFS,

[ECF No. 5] Defendants.

AND

16 2) DISMISSING COMPLAINT FOR

FAILING TO STATE A CLAIM

PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) AND 19 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) 20 Jeffrey Daniel Hudson (“Plaintiff”), while detained at George Bailey Detention Facility (“GBDF”) in San Diego, California, and proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights Complaint (“Compl.”) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (See Compl., ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff did not pay the fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) when he filed his Complaint; instead he has filed a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) (ECF No. 5). / / / / / / I. Motion to Proceed IFP All parties instituting any civil action, suit or proceeding in a district court of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.