Petconnect Rescue, Inc. v. Salinas

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 3, 20223:20-cv-00527California2,344 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PETCONNECT RESCUE, INC., et al., Case No.: 20-cv-00527-LL-DEB

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION TO COMPEL RESPONSES

TO INTERROGATORY NOS. 18–

DAVID SALINAS, et al.,

TO DEFENDANT SELECT AND 22–

Defendants. 23 TO DEFENDANT MOHRFELD

16 [DKT. NO. 211] 17 I. INTRODUCTION Before the Court is Plaintiff Petconnect Rescue, Inc.’s Motion to Compel Responses to its Interrogatory Nos. 18–19 to Defendant Select Puppies, Inc. and Interrogatory Nos. 22–23 to Defendant Brian Mohrfeld. Dkt. No. 211.1 Plaintiff also seeks $12,090.00 in attorneys’ fees from Defendants pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37. Dkt. 23 24

26 1 The Court took these issues under submission at the March 30, 2022 hearing. Dkt. No. 223. 28 No. 211-1 at 18. For the reasons set forth below, the Court grants Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel but denies Plaintiff’s request for attorney’s fees. II. BACKGROUND On …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.