Kinney

Johnson v. Kinney

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 30, 20223:20-cv-01354California4,473 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

.

. 4 5 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 |} ANTHONY JOHNSON, Case No.: 20-cv-1354-JO-MSB Plaintitt,| ORDER DENYING MOTION TO 13 || V- DECLARE PLAINTIFF A || DAVID KINNEY, et al., GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS ||. Defendants.| AND DENYING AS MOOT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF PARTIAL

JUDGMENT

17 18 19 20 Defendant Storix, Inc. filed a motion for an order declaring Plaintiff Anthony 22 || Johnson a vexatious litigant and a motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6). Plaintiff filed < |}motion for entry of partial judgment under Rule 54(b), to immediately appeal hi: ||previously dismissed claims. On February 16, 2022, the Court held oral argument. For the reasons stated on the record during oral argument, the Court grants the 26 || parties’ requests that the Court take judicial notice under Fed. R. Evid.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.