Morton
Morton v. County of San Diego
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARILYN MORTON and DEAN Case No. 21-cv-1428-MMA (KSC)
MORTON,
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
Plaintiffs, DENYING IN PART COUNTY v. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO
DISMISS
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, et al., 15 Defendants. [Doc. No. 21] 16 17 18 Marilyn Morton (“Ms. Morton”), as successor in interest to Decedent Joseph Earl Morton’s (“Mr. Morton”) estate, as well as Ms. Morton and Dean Morton as individuals (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), bring this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the County of San Diego (the “County”), Samantha Macanlalay (“Macanlalay”), Bijan Rahmani (“Rahmani”), Hosanna Alto (“Alto”), Matthew Berlin (“Berlin”), Liberty Healthcare (“Liberty”), and Does 1–10. See Doc. No. 20 (“Second Amended Complaint” or “SAC”). Defendants Macanlalay, Alto, and the County (“County Defendants”) move to dismiss the second, third, fourth, and fifth causes of action against them pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil…