Herrera

Herrera v. General Atomics

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 3, 20223:21-cv-01632California5,699 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 Case No.: 21cv1632-AJB(BLM) ERNESTO HERRERA,

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S EX

PARTE APPLICATION FOR ORDER

v. EXTENDING DEADLINES FOR

COMPLETION OF FACT DISCOVERY

GENERAL ATOMICS, CARLOS ROMAN DIAZ

AND EXPERT WITNESS DISCLOSURE

DE LEON, AND DOES 1-50,

AND GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S Defendants. MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES

16 [ECF NOS. 18 AND 19] 17 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s April 8, 2022 Application for Order Extending Deadlines [ECF No. 18 (“Mot.”)], Defendant’s April 12, 2022 Opposition to the motion [ECF No. 21 (“Mot. Opp.”)], Plaintiff’s April 8, 2022 Motion to Compel Further Responses to Request for Production of Documents to Defendant General Atomics, Set One [ECF No. 19 (“MTC”)] and Defendant’s April 15, 2022 Opposition to the motion [ECF No 26 (“MTC Oppo.”)]. For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiff’s Application for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.