Produce Pay, Inc. v. FVF Distributors Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 3, 20223:20-cv-00517California4,482 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PRODUCE PAY, INC., Case No. 20-cv-517-MMA (BGS)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR JUDGMENT

FVF DISTRIBUTORS INC., et al., Defendants. [Doc. No. 62] 16 On September 13, 2021, Plaintiff Produce Pay, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) filed a motion for judgment pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure § 664.6. The motion is unopposed to date. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Plaintiff’s motion. I. BACKGROUND This case has an unusual history, factually and procedurally. On March 19, 2020, Plaintiff filed a Complaint against FVF Distributors Inc. (“FVF”), Veg-Fresh Farms, LLC, Mark C. Widder, Robert L. Whitney, Jr., Lawrence D. Cancellieri, Randy J. Cancellieri, Adam T. Cancellieri, and F. David Avila (“Mr. Avila”) pursuant to the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act, 7 U.S.C. §§…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.