Polus

Polus v. Sharp Healthcare

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 9, 20223:20-cv-02253California1,472 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAWAHER POLUS, Case No.: 3:20-cv-02253-RBM-KSC

Plaintiffs,

ORDER:

v. (1) SUA SPONTE REMANDING SHARP HEALTHCARE, et al.,

CASE FOR LACK OF SUBJECT

Defendants. MATTER JURISDICTION; AND

16 (2) DENYING AS MOOT DEFENDANT SHARP

HEALTHCARE’S MOTIONS TO

STRIKE AND DISMISS THE FIRST

AMENDED COMPLAINT

20 [Doc. 23] 21 On September 7, 2021, Defendant Sharp Healthcare (“Sharp”) filed a motion to strike and dismiss Plaintiff Jawaher Polus’s (“Plaintiff”) first amended complaint (“FAC”) for failure to state a claim (the “MTD”). (Doc. 23.) Plaintiff filed a brief in opposition to Sharp’s MTD on October 7, 2021. (Doc. 24.) Sharp filed a reply brief in support of its MTD on October 11, 2021. (Doc. 25.) The MTD was taken under submission pursuant to the Court’s October 14, 2021 order. (Doc. 26.) For the reasons discussed herein, the Court DENIES as moot…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.