Thistle

Thistle v. The State of New Hampshire

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 6, 20223:21-cv-02072California4,228 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 DAVID JOHN THISTLE, Case No.: 21cv02072-LL-BGS

Plaintiff, ORDER: v. (1) DENYING REQUEST FOR

CONTINUANCE

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE, (2) DISMISSING COMPLAINT Defendant. [ECF No. 6] 15 I. INTRODUCTION Before the Court is the “First Response for Continuance”= of Plaintiff David John Thistle (“Plaintiff”), appearing pro se. ECF No. 6. Having considered carefully Plaintiff’s filing and the applicable law, the Court (1) DENIES the request for a continuance and (2) DISMISSES the Complaint sua sponte with prejudice due to lack of subject matter jurisdiction. II. BACKGROUND On December 13, 2021, Plaintiff filed six (6) lawsuits in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, alleging that the various Secretary of State websites of the states sued contained unconstitutional limitations on candidate eligibility

26 In reviewing the instant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.