Ainab

Ainab v. Kijakazi

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 10, 20223:20-cv-01780California3,479 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NACIMO A., Case No.: 20-cv-1780-KSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER ON JOINT MOTION FOR

v. JUDICIAL REVIEW

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting

Commissioner of Social Security, [Doc. No. 20] Defendant.

17 On September 10, 2020, plaintiff Nacimo A. (“plaintiff”) filed a complaint under 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) and 1383(c) seeking judicial review of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration’s1 (“defendant” or the “Commissioner”) denial of disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act (the “Act”). Doc. No. 1. Before the Court is the parties’ Joint Motion for Judicial Review of the Commissioner’s final decision (the “Joint Motion” or “Jt. Mot.”). Doc. No. 20. The parties have consented to have the matter heard and resolved by a Magistrate Judge. Doc. No. 5. Having considered the papers, the Certified Administrative

27 1…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.