William and Ave Bortz v. JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 10, 20223:21-cv-00618California5,794 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WILLIAM AND AVE BORTZ, Case No.: 21-CV-618 TWR (DEB)

Plaintiffs,

ORDER (1) GRANTING

v. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO

DISMISS FIRST AMENDED

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.;

COMPLAINT, AND

SHAWNA BROWN; ARCHIE

(2) DISMISSING WITH PREJUDICE

ALVARADO; JOEL PETRIASHVIL-

PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED

REYES; MICHELLE MARTINEZ;

COMPLAINT

ARNIE SINGSON; BRIAN CRUZ; and 17 DOES 1–50, inclusive, (ECF No. 16) 18 Defendants.

20 Presently before the Court is the Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint (“Mot.,” ECF No. 16) filed by Defendants JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“Chase”); Shauna Brown (erroneously named as Shawna Brown); Archie Alvarado; Joel Petriashvili-Reyes (erroneously named as Joel Petriashvil-Reyes); Michele Martinez (erroneously named as Michelle Martinez); Arnie Singson; and Brian Cruz, as well as Plaintiffs William and Ave Bortz’s Opposition to (“Opp’n,” ECF No. 20)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.