Rodriguez

Rodriguez v. Gore

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 13, 20223:22-cv-00564California1,728 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PEDRO RODRIGUEZ, Case No. 3:22-cv-0564-LAB-MDD Booking #14745493,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

Plaintiff, PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS vs. AS BARRED BY 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) 14 [Dkt. 2]

15 WILLIAM GORE, et al.,

AND

Defendants. DISMISSING CIVIL ACTION

WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR

FAILURE TO PAY FILING FEE

REQUIRED BY 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) 20 Plaintiff Pedro Rodriguez, a former state prisoner who is currently detained at the San Diego Central Jail (“SDCJ”) is proceeding pro se and has filed a civil rights Complaint (“Compl.”) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. See Compl. ECF No. 1. Rodriguez did not prepay the civil filing fee required to commence a civil action at the time he filed his Complaint; instead, he has filed a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). See ECF No. 2. Rodriguez seeks to sue former San…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.