Penkert

Penkert v. Phantom Bikes, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 13, 20223:22-cv-00305California3,101 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CAROL PENKERT, Case No. 22-cv-305-MMA (DEB)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. REMAND

PHANTOM BIKES, INC. et al., [Doc. No. 6] Defendants. 16 17 On November 15, 2021, Plaintiff Carol Penkert (“Plaintiff”) initiated a civil action against Phantom Bikes, Inc. (“Phantom”) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (“Costco”) in the Superior Court of California, County of San Diego, Case No. 37-2021-00048333- CU-PO-CTL. See Doc. No. 1 at Ex. A (“State Ct. Compl.”). On March 4, 2022, Phantom filed a notice of removal to this Court. Doc. No. 1 (“Notice of Removal” or “NOR”). Plaintiff now moves to remand this action back to state court. Doc. No. 6. Phantom filed an opposition, to which Plaintiff replied. Doc. Nos. 7, 9. The Court found the matter suitable for determination on the papers and without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1.d.1. Doc. No. 12. For the reasons set forth…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.