Garcia

Garcia v. Acushnet Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 29, 20223:21-cv-01581California3,715 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 BLANCA GARCIA and MATILDE ) Case No.: 3:21-cv-01581-BEN-BGS CABRERA, on behalf of themselves and ) others similarly situated, ) ORDER DENYING MOTION TO Plaintiffs, ) REMAND THE ACTION TO STATE ) COURT AND REQUEST FOR v. ) ATTORNEYS’ FEES IN THE ACUSHNET COMPANY; and DOES ) AMOUNT OF $5,775.00 ) to 100, inclusive, ) Defendant. ) [ECF No. 6]

I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs Blanca Garcia and Matilde Cabrera, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated bring this employment action against Defendant Acushnet Company. Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand. The Motion was submitted on the papers without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1) and Rule 78(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. ECF No. 12. After considering the papers submitted, supporting documentation, and applicable law, the Court DENIES Plaintiffs’ Motion to 25 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.