Jones

Jones v. Peng

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 12, 20223:21-cv-01912California889 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WAYNE ELIJAH JONES, Case No. 21-cv-1912-MMA (BLM)

INMATE #20902359,

ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL

Plaintiff, ACTION FOR FAILURE TO vs. PROSECUTE IN COMPLIANCE

WITH COURT ORDER

P. PENG, et al.,

15 Defendants. 16 17 18 On November 9, 2021, Plaintiff Wayne Elijah Jones, incarcerated at the Vista Detention Facility in Vista, California, but subsequently transferred to the San Diego County Jail, proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 accompanied by a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Doc. Nos. 1, 2. After the Court twice denied Plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis for lack of adequate supporting financial documentation, see Doc. Nos. 3, 6, Plaintiff provided the proper financial documents on January 13, 2022, Doc. No. 8. On January 28, 2022, the Court granted Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and screened the Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) and 28 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.