Oliver

Oliver v. Mihelic

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 13, 20223:21-cv-01807California1,181 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 THOMAS OLIVER, Case No.: 21cv1807-LL-DEB

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

v. ALTER JUDGMENT

KRISTIN TAVIA MIHELIC, et al., [ECF No. 30] Defendants. 16 Presently before the Court is Plaintiff’s “Motion for Justice II” which this Court construes as a renewed Motion to Alter Judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e). ECF No. 30. The Court finds the Motion suitable for submission without oral argument. For the reasons set forth below, the Motion is DENIED. I. Background On October 28, 2021, Defendant United States filed a “Motion to Dismiss Claims One and Three Through Seven of the Removed Amended Complaint for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction and Failure to Allege a Cognizable Claim.” ECF No. 5. On November 22, 2021, Plaintiff Thomas Oliver, proceeding pro se, filed an “Objection” in response to the United States’ Motion to Dismiss. ECF No. 11. On November 29,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.