Jacome

Jacome v. Hill

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 17, 20223:22-cv-00546California1,420 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALEXANDER JACOME, Case No.: 3:22-cv-00546-GPC-MDD Petitioner,

ORDER:

v. (1) GRANTING MOTION TO JAMES S. HILL, Warden, et al.,

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

Respondents. [ECF No. 2]; and 16 (2) NOTIFYING PETITIONER OF POSSIBLE DISMISSAL OF

PETITION FOR FAILURE TO

EXHAUST STATE COURT

REMEDIES 20 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 together with a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF Nos. 1, 2. I. MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS In support of his motion to proceed in forma pauperis, Petitioner has submitted a Prison Certificate from the facility in which he is presently confined which reflects a balance of $0.00. Petitioner cannot afford the $5.00 filing fee. Thus, the Court GRANTS 28 Petitioner’s application to proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.