Esteghalian
Esteghalian v. Department of the Navy
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MANIJEH ESTEGHLALIAN, et al., Case No.: 19cv1808-LL-MSB
Plaintiffs,
ORDER:
v. (1) DISMISSING PLAINTIFFS’ DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY; EDCO
SECOND AMENDED
WASTE AND RECYCLING SERVICES,
COMPLAINT WITHOUT Defendants. LEAVE TO AMEND 16 [ECF No. 10]; 17 (2) DENYING PLAINTIFFS’
MOTIONS TO PROCEED IN
FORMA PAUPERIS AS MOOT [ECF Nos. 14, 15] 20 Presently before the Court is the Second Amended Complaint (“SAC,” ECF No. 10), filed by Plaintiffs Manijeh Esteghlalian and Al Giovanni. For the reasons discussed below, upon the Court’s screening of the Second Amended Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), the Court DISMISSES the Second Amended Complaint WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND. Because the Court dismisses Plaintiffs’ operative complaint without leave to amend, the Court also DENIES AS MOOT Plaintiffs’ IFP Motions. ECF Nos. 14, 15. / / / / / / I. Procedural History Plaintiff…