Fisher

Williams v. Fisher

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 17, 20223:22-cv-00524California1,577 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TOMMY LEE WILLIAMS, Case No.: 3:22-cv-00524-GPC-NLS

Petitioner,

ORDER DISMISSING CASE

v. WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND WITH

LEAVE TO AMEND

RAYTHEL FISHER, Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. ECF No. 1. FAILURE TO SATISFY FILING FEE REQUIREMENT Petitioner has not paid the $5.00 filing fee and has not moved to proceed in forma pauperis. This Court cannot proceed until Petitioner has either paid the filing fee or qualified to proceed in forma pauperis. See Rule 3(a), 28 U.S.C. foll. § 2254. ABSTENTION Petitioner lists his place of confinement as the Vista Detention Center. See Pet., ECF No. 1 at 1. The San Diego County Sheriff’s Department website shows that Williams is currently in custody pursuant to San Diego Superior Court case number SCN236445, 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.