Nia

Nia v. Bank of America, N.A.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 18, 20223:21-cv-01799California7,372 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No. 21-cv-01799-BAS-BGS

MOHAMMAD FARSHAD ABDOLLAH

NIA, Individually, and on Behalf of All

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

Others Similarly Situated, DISMISS Plaintiff, 14 v. (ECF No. 12)

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.,

16 Defendant. 17 Plaintiff Mohammed Farshad Abdollah Nia filed his Complaint in this action in the Superior Court of California, County of San Diego. (Compl., Ex. A to Notice of Removal, ECF No. 1.) Defendant Bank of America, N.A. (“BANA”) removed the case to this Court (Notice of Removal) and then moved to dismiss the Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) (Mot., ECF No. 12). Plaintiff opposed the motion (Opp’n, ECF No. 15), and BANA replied (Reply, ECF No. 16). The Court finds BANA’s motion to dismiss suitable for determination on the papers submitted and without oral argument. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); Civ. L.R. 7.1(d)(1). Having considered the parties’ submissions and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.